County of Mono v. Liberty Utilities Calpeco Electric, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 6, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-00834·Unknown

Opinion

1 Krsto Miyanovic (Bar No. 205060) kmijanovic@hbblaw.com 2 Patrick F. McIntyre (Bar No. 272042) pmcintyre@hbblaw.com 3 Steven A. Scordalakis (Bar No. 293212) sscordalakis@hbblaw.com 4 HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP 555 South Flower Street, Forty-Fifth Floor 5 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: 213.542.8000 6 Facsimile: 213.542.8100 7 Attorneys for Defendant LIBERTY UTILITIES (CALPECO ELECTRIC), LLC JOHN P. FISKE (SBN 249256) 9 ] JASON J. JULIUS (SBN 249036) BARON & BUDD, P.C. 10 11440 West Bernardo Court, Suite 265 San Diego, CA 92127 11 Tel: 858.251.7424 Email: jfiske@baronbudd.com 12 iulius@baronbudd.com

ED DIAB (SBN 262319) oN DEBORAH S. DIXON (SBN 248965) = 14 || ROBERTY J. CHAMBERS II (SBN 244688) cS DIXON DIAB & CHAMBERS LLP 15 501 W. Broadway, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 16 Tel: 619.354.2662 Email: diab@theddcfirm.com 17 ddixon@theddcfirm.com rob@theddcfirm.com 18 Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 21 COUNTY OF MONO, et al. Case No. 2:21-cv-00834-KJM-KJIN 22 Plaintiffs, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 23 v. 24 LIBERTY UTILITIES (CALPECO 25 ELECTRIC), LLC, et al., 26 Defendants. 27 28

1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery activity in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, 3 or private information that a party may claim deserves special protection from public disclosure 4 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 5 The parties acknowledge that this Stipulation and Order does not confer blanket 6 protections on all responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 7 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 8 under the applicable legal principles. The parties retain and reserve their rights to seek a 9 modification of the Order should the Order prove problematic or unworkable in practice due to 10 unforeseen issues, and all parties agree not to assert that any such proposed modifications are 11 foreclosed by this Order. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that 12 this Stipulation and Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil 13 Local Rule 141 and 141.1 set forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that Of 14 || will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 15 } 2. DEFINITIONS 16 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 17 information or items under this Stipulation and Order. 18 2.2. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 19 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 20 of Civil Procedure 26(c), including, but not limited to, (1) trade secrets as defined by applicable 21 legal principles; (2) confidential personally identifiable information; (3) other confidential 22 research and development information; (4) competitively sensitive commercial or proprietary 23 information; (5) confidential financial information, including financial information about any 24 party to this lawsuit or its individual employees, owners or members; (6) confidential customer 25 data as defined by California Public Utilities Code sections 8380 and 8381; (7) personal or 26 confidential/privileged information about an individual collected or received in connection with an 27 insurance claim, as contemplated by California Insurance Code Section 791.13; and/or (8) any 28 other information protected by the Constitution of the United States, California’s Constitution and

1 common law right to privacy. 2 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as 3 well as their support staff). 4 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 5 produces in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 6 2.5. Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner 7 in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 8 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in responses to discovery in this 9 matter. 10 2.6. Action: the action entitled County of Mono, et al. v. Liberty Utilities (CalPeco 11 Electric) LLC, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-00834-DAD-KJN. 12 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 13 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a Of 14 || consultant in this Action. 15 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House 16 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 17 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 18 entity not named as a Party to this Action. 19 2.10 Qutside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 20 Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this 21 Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of 22 that party. 23 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its members, officers, directors, 24 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 25 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Discovery Material in this 26 Action. 27 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 28 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

County of Mono v. Liberty Utilities Calpeco Electric, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

County of Mono v. Liberty Utilities Calpeco Electric, LLC (County of Mono v. Liberty Utilities Calpeco Electric, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.