County of Madison v. Warren

106 U.S. 622, 2 S. Ct. 86, 27 L. Ed. 311, 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1593
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 18, 1883
Docket1042
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 106 U.S. 622 (County of Madison v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
County of Madison v. Warren, 106 U.S. 622, 2 S. Ct. 86, 27 L. Ed. 311, 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1593 (1883).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a case tried and determined by the court without the intervention of a jury. The record does not show any stipulation in writing waiving a jury. The errors assigned all relate to. rulings of the court on the trial, excepted to at the time, and presented by a bill of exceptions. The rule is well settled, •that if a written stipulation waiving a jury is not in some way *623 shown affirmatively in the record, none of the questions decided at the trial can be re-examined here on writ of error. Kearney v. Case, 12 Wall. 275; Gilman v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co., 91 U. S. 603; Boogher v. New York Life Insurance Co., 103 id. 90; Hodges v. Easton, ante, p. 408.

For this reason, and without passing on any of the questions presented by the assignment of errors, the judgment is '

Affirmed.

Note.— County of Alexander v. Kimball, error to the same court as the preceding case, was submitted by Mr. William B. Gilbert for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. T. C. Mather for the defendant in error. It involved the .precise question decided in that case, and a judgment to the same effect was rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guiles v. United States
100 F.2d 47 (Ninth Circuit, 1938)
Noone v. Sinner
24 F.2d 960 (Eighth Circuit, 1928)
Harris v. Newsom
23 F.2d 652 (Eighth Circuit, 1927)
Graver Corp. v. Hercules Gasoline Co.
16 F.2d 459 (Ninth Circuit, 1926)
James-Dickinson Farm Mortgage Co. v. Seimer
12 F.2d 772 (Seventh Circuit, 1926)
Twist v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.
6 F.2d 347 (Eighth Circuit, 1925)
T. H. Flood & Co. v. Bates
283 F. 364 (Seventh Circuit, 1922)
United States v. National City Bank of New York
281 F. 754 (Second Circuit, 1922)
City of Cleveland v. Walsh Construction Co.
279 F. 57 (Sixth Circuit, 1922)
Ford v. Grimmett
278 F. 140 (Fifth Circuit, 1922)
Erkel v. United States
169 F. 623 (Ninth Circuit, 1909)
Shields v. Mongollon Exploration Co.
137 F. 539 (Ninth Circuit, 1905)
Ham v. Edgell
106 F. 820 (Fifth Circuit, 1901)
Duncan v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.
72 F. 808 (Ninth Circuit, 1896)
United States ex rel. Deimel v. Arnold
69 F. 987 (Seventh Circuit, 1895)
Branch v. Texas Lumber Manuf'g Co.
53 F. 849 (Fifth Circuit, 1893)
Bond v. Dustin
112 U.S. 604 (Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 U.S. 622, 2 S. Ct. 86, 27 L. Ed. 311, 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-madison-v-warren-scotus-1883.