County of Los Angeles v. Marblehead Land Company

273 P. 138, 95 Cal. App. 799
California Court of Appeal·Decided December 21, 1928·No. Docket No. 5380.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASE.
THE COURT.

The defendants having filed their bill of costs and disbursements, the court, on motion duly made, struck from the bill sundry large items, and allowed costs in a greatly reduced sum. From the order so made, the defendants appeal.

[1] The questions of law presented on this appeal are substantially the same as those discussed in City of LosAngeles v. Vickers, 81 Cal.App. 737 [254 P. 687], where the principles which apply here are very clearly stated. In accordance with the decision in that case, it is ordered that the order from which defendants appeal be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

County of Los Angeles v. Marblehead Land Company, 273 P. 138, 95 Cal. App. 799 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928).

273 P. 138 (County of Los Angeles v. Marblehead Land Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Detroit Edison Co. v. Janosz
87 N.W.2d 126 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1957)