County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident Commission

39 P.2d 477, 3 Cal. App. 2d 754, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1215
California Court of Appeal·Decided December 28, 1934·No. Civ. No. 10086·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

STEPHENS, P. J.

On November 22, 1923, respondent Munguia, who was at that time receiving aid as a county welfare case, was given a work order by the charities de[755]*755partment- of petitioner and while thus engaged suffered injury for which award was made.

The questions here presented are identical with the case of County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Acc. Com., 2 Cal. App. (2d) 614 [38 Pac. (2d) 828], in which we concluded that such an award was improper because the injured party was not an employee under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Award annulled.

Scott, J., pro tem., and Crail, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident Commission, 39 P.2d 477, 3 Cal. App. 2d 754, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1215 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).

39 P.2d 477 (County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
637 P.2d 681 (California Supreme Court, 1981)
City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident Commission
47 P.2d 1096 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)