County of Los Angeles v. Babcock

45 Cal. 252
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1873·No. No. 3,618·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

Without noticing other objections to the complaint we are satisfied that the demurrer should have been sustained, on the ground that it is not averred that Pollock was released from custody upon or by reason of the execution and delivery of the bond set forth. This averment is indispensable in an action of this character.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the Court below to sustain the demurrer, and with leave to the District Attorney to amend the complaint in the respect indicated and in such other respects as he may be advised.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

County of Los Angeles v. Babcock, 45 Cal. 252 (Cal. 1873).

45 Cal. 252 (County of Los Angeles v. Babcock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McDonald
255 P. 180 (California Supreme Court, 1927)
State v. Foxley
249 P. 125 (Utah Supreme Court, 1926)
People v. Noble
28 P.R. 655 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1920)
Pueblo v. Noble
28 P.R. Dec. 702 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1920)
Coburn v. Pearson
57 Cal. 306 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Jenner v. Stroh
52 Cal. 504 (California Supreme Court, 1877)