County of Grayson v. Spane

Fourth Circuit

County of Grayson v. Spane

609 F. App'x 150

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 2, 2015·No. No. 14-1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their fraud in the inducement claims against John T. Spane and Dale W. Sutphin. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cnty. Of Grayson v. Spane, No. 7:13-cv-00384-GEC, 2014 WL 2257155 (W.D.Va. May 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before .this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their fraud in the inducement claims against John T. Spane and Dale W. Sutphin. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cnty. Of Grayson v. Spane, No. 7:13-cv-00384-GEC, 2014 WL 2257155 (W.D.Va. May 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before .this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

County of Grayson v. Spane, 609 F. App'x 150 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

609 F. App'x 150 (County of Grayson v. Spane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related