County of Grayson v. Spane
This text of 609 F. App'x 150 (County of Grayson v. Spane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their fraud in the inducement claims against John T. Spane and Dale W. Sutphin. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cnty. Of Grayson v. Spane, No. 7:13-cv-00384-GEC, 2014 WL 2257155 (W.D.Va. May 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before .this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
609 F. App'x 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-grayson-v-spane-ca4-2015.