County of Erie v. Fairchild

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

County of Erie v. Fairchild

255 A.D. 1028, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6308

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 1938·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The record presents a fair question of fact and we are unable to say that the damages awarded do not compensate the owner adequately for the interest in the property taken. All concur. (The order confirms a report of the commissioners in a condemnation proceeding.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The record presents a fair question of fact and we are unable to say that the damages awarded do not compensate the owner adequately for the interest in the property taken. All concur. (The order confirms a report of the commissioners in a condemnation proceeding.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

County of Erie v. Fairchild, 255 A.D. 1028, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6308 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 1028 (County of Erie v. Fairchild) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.