County of Erie v. Fairchild

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

County of Erie v. Fairchild

255 A.D. 1028, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6308

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 1028 (County of Erie v. Fairchild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

County of Erie v. Fairchild, 255 A.D. 1028, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6308 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The record presents a fair question of fact and we are unable to say that the damages awarded do not compensate the owner adequately for the interest in the property taken. All concur. (The order confirms a report of the commissioners in a condemnation proceeding.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The record presents a fair question of fact and we are unable to say that the damages awarded do not compensate the owner adequately for the interest in the property taken. All concur. (The order confirms a report of the commissioners in a condemnation proceeding.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 1028, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-erie-v-fairchild-nyappdiv-1938.