County of Durham v. AREC 3, LLC
652 S.E.2d 260, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 1052, 2007 WL 3053673
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in County of Durham v. AREC 3, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 652 S.E.2d 260 →
Opinion
COUNTY OF DURHAM
v.
AREC 3, LLC, et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jay Ferguson, Durham, Richard Bydee, for AREC 3, LLC.
Marie Inserra, for County of Durham.
Richard Weintraub, for City of Durham.
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of October *261 2007 by Petitioner (Hill) for Extension of Time to Respond to AREC 3, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Prohibition, Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Petition for Writ of Supersedeas and Motion for Temporary Stay:
"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of October 2007."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
County of Durham v. AREC 3, LLC, 652 S.E.2d 260, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 1052, 2007 WL 3053673 (N.C. 2007).
652 S.E.2d 260 (County of Durham v. AREC 3, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
County of Durham v. Arec 3, LLC
652 S.E.2d 260 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)