County of Douglas v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
This text of 590 P.2d 160 (County of Douglas v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The County of Douglas, Nevada, with its Planning Director/ Manager and its Engineer, here appeal from a judgment enjoining their approval of any parcel maps violating the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency ordinances, and ordering them to vacate approval and certifications of one such parcel map, as well as to expunge that map from the county’s official records.
The facts are undisputed. The county approved and certified a parcel map which satisfies Douglas County ordinances, but violates TRPA’s land use ordinance. TRPA brought this action to compel County and its officers to vacate their approval and certifications of that parcel map and to expunge it from County’s official records.1 Judgment was granted in favor of TRPA. Appellants claim they need not enforce the TRPA’s ordinance, and proffer various arguments in support of their position. The trial court considered and disposed of all of these arguments in its decision, No. 7327, filed August 9, 1976, and captioned “Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) vs. Henry J. Martin, et al.” For the reasons given, and based on the authority set forth therein, we affirm the judgment.2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
590 P.2d 160, 95 Nev. 101, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-douglas-v-tahoe-regional-planning-agency-nev-1979.