County of Cook v. Barsaloux

54 Ill. App. 208, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 77
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided July 2, 1894·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The pleadings on the part of the appellee display considerable originality, but are saved by the stereotyped count for goods sold and delivered.

The appellee proved that he sold and delivered goods to the county, rendered bills, and that the bills were audited and ordered paid by the Board of County Commissioners, as in County of Cook v. Ryan, 51 Ill. App. 190.

He has recovered—why does not appear—-more than $300 less than the amount of the bills so ordered paid.

The parties have made their arguments as to the validity of warrants on the county treasury issued to the appellee, but in the view we take of the case it is unnécessary to .consider that question.

The judgment is affirmed on the authority of the case cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

County of Cook v. Barsaloux, 54 Ill. App. 208, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 77 (Ill. Ct. App. 1894).

54 Ill. App. 208 (County of Cook v. Barsaloux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Cook v. Ryan
51 Ill. App. 190 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)