County of Carteret v. Simmons Construction Corp.

154 S.E. 746, 199 N.C. 485, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 156
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 24, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record discloses no action on the part of the trial court of which the defendants can justly complain.

*486 The pertinent rule is stated in 49 C. J., 625, as follows :

“It is a matter for the sound discretion of tbe court whether under the circumstances of the case a demand for a bill of particulars should be granted or refused. This power of the court exists by virtue of its general power to regulate the conduct of trials, and it is incident to its general authority in the administration of justice. It is the same power in kind that courts have to grant a new trial on the ground of surprise.”

Our own decisions are to the same effect: Power Co. v. Elizabeth City, 188 N. C., 278, 124 S. E., 611; Townsend v. Williams, 117 N. C., 330, 23 S. E., 461.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

County of Carteret v. Simmons Construction Corp., 154 S.E. 746, 199 N.C. 485, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 156 (N.C. 1930).

154 S.E. 746 (County of Carteret v. Simmons Construction Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Temple v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
171 S.E. 630 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)