County of Broome v. Shah

New York Court of Appeals

County of Broome v. Shah

71 N.E.3d 591, 28 N.Y.3d 1175

DecidedFebruary 16, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 71 N.E.3d 591 (County of Broome v. Shah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

County of Broome v. Shah, 71 N.E.3d 591, 28 N.Y.3d 1175 (N.Y. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, without costs, petition dismissed in its entirety, and a declaration made in favor of respondents Nirav R. Shah, as Commissioner of Health, et al. that section 61 of part D of section 1 of chapter 56 of the Laws of 2012 has not been shown to be unconstitutional (see Matter of County of Chemung v Shah, 28 NY3d 244 [2016]).

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Garcia and Wilson. Taking no part: Judges Stein and Fahey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, without costs, petition dismissed in its entirety, and a declaration made in favor of respondents Nirav R. Shah, as Commissioner of Health, et al. that section 61 of part D of section 1 of chapter 56 of the Laws of 2012 has not been shown to be unconstitutional (see Matter of County of Chemung v Shah, 28 NY3d 244 [2016]).

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Garcia and Wilson. Taking no part: Judges Stein and Fahey.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 N.E.3d 591, 28 N.Y.3d 1175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-broome-v-shah-ny-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack