County of Broome v. McKune
This text of 59 N.E.2d 176 (County of Broome v. McKune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughkan, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, and Desmond, JJ. Thachek, J., dissents on the ground that any allowance of. consequential damages for trees within the highway limits was improper in this case because of' the right *811 of the State to remove these trees for highway purposes at any time without compensation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 N.E.2d 176, 293 N.Y. 809, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-broome-v-mckune-ny-1944.