County of Broome v. McKune

59 N.E.2d 176, 293 N.Y. 809, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2235
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 16, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 59 N.E.2d 176 (County of Broome v. McKune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
County of Broome v. McKune, 59 N.E.2d 176, 293 N.Y. 809, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2235 (N.Y. 1944).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughkan, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, and Desmond, JJ. Thachek, J., dissents on the ground that any allowance of. consequential damages for trees within the highway limits was improper in this case because of' the right *811 of the State to remove these trees for highway purposes at any time without compensation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Organek v. State
151 Misc. 2d 78 (New York State Court of Claims, 1991)
Crowell v. State
18 A.D.2d 7 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Aichino v. State
2 Misc. 2d 1001 (New York State Court of Claims, 1956)
Moulthrop v. State
193 Misc. 737 (New York State Court of Claims, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 N.E.2d 176, 293 N.Y. 809, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-broome-v-mckune-ny-1944.