County of Broome v. McKune
59 N.E.2d 176, 293 N.Y. 809, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2235
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughkan, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, and Desmond, JJ. Thachek, J., dissents on the ground that any allowance of. consequential damages for trees within the highway limits was improper in this case because of' the right *811 of the State to remove these trees for highway purposes at any time without compensation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
County of Broome v. McKune, 59 N.E.2d 176, 293 N.Y. 809, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2235 (N.Y. 1944).
59 N.E.2d 176 (County of Broome v. McKune) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Organek v. State
151 Misc. 2d 78 (New York State Court of Claims, 1991)
Crowell v. State
18 A.D.2d 7 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Aichino v. State
2 Misc. 2d 1001 (New York State Court of Claims, 1956)
Moulthrop v. State
193 Misc. 737 (New York State Court of Claims, 1948)