Counts v. Ralston Purina Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Counts v. Ralston Purina Co.

835 S.W.2d 492, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 1992 WL 144878

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1992·No. No. 61413·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Steven Counts, appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent, Ralston Purina Company, entered in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. We have reviewed the briefs and [493]*493arguments of the parties, as well as the legal files, and have found no clear error on the part of the trial court. As we further find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties, solely for their own information, explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Steven Counts, appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent, Ralston Purina Company, entered in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. We have reviewed the briefs and [493]*493arguments of the parties, as well as the legal files, and have found no clear error on the part of the trial court. As we further find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties, solely for their own information, explaining the reasons for our decision.

Counts v. Ralston Purina Co., 835 S.W.2d 492, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 1992 WL 144878 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

835 S.W.2d 492 (Counts v. Ralston Purina Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.