Counts v. Counts
373 U.S. 543, 83 S. Ct. 1549, 10 L. Ed. 2d 688, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1447
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Counts v. Counts, 373 U.S. 543, 83 S. Ct. 1549, 10 L. Ed. 2d 688, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1447 (1963).
373 U.S. 543 (Counts v. Counts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilborn v. GE Marquette Medical Systems, Inc.
163 S.W.3d 264 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Wilborn v. Life Ambulance Services, Inc.
163 S.W.3d 271 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Charlotte R. Wilborn, Individually and as the Administratix of the Estate of Edward E. Wilborn, Ede R. Wilborn, Ja'millie Williams Wilborn and Esther O. Morris v. GE Marquette Medical Systems, Inc. and Marquette Electronics, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005
Waste Water, Inc. v. Alpha Finishing & Developing Corp.
874 S.W.2d 940 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
McCord v. Watts
777 S.W.2d 809 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Holberg v. Short
731 S.W.2d 584 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
State v. Crank
666 S.W.2d 91 (Texas Supreme Court, 1984)
Van Sickle v. Stroud
467 S.W.2d 509 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)