Countryman v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.

16 S.E. 84, 89 Ga. 835
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 1, 1892·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[835] Judgment affirmed,.

■Wright & Harris, for plaintiff. Dorsey, Brewster & Howell and McOutchbn & Shumate, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Countryman v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co., 16 S.E. 84, 89 Ga. 835 (Ga. 1892).

16 S.E. 84 (Countryman v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kunz v. Custer
120 S.E.2d 186 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Arcola Sugar Mills Co. v. Luckey
144 S.W. 1148 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Ragan v. Coley & Brother
61 S.E. 862 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)