Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. TC Acupuncture, P.C.
This text of Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. TC Acupuncture, P.C. (Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. TC Acupuncture, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
TC Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Jims Calixte, Respondent-Appellant.
Country-Wide Ins. Co., Petitioner-Respondent,
against
New Century Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o William Dew, Respondent-Appellant.
Country-Wide Ins. Co., Petitioner-Respondent,
against
New Century Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Debra Bond, Respondent-Appellant.
Country-Wide Ins. Co., Petitioner-Respondent,
against
New Century Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Ernig Mejia, Respondent-Appellant.
Country-Wide Ins. Co., Petitioner-Respondent,
against
TC Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Johnny Sejour, Respondent-Appellant.
Country-Wide Ins. Co., Petitioner-Respondent,
against
New Century Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o William Dew, Respondent-Appellant.
In consolidated appeals, respondents appeal from six orders of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Michael L. Katz, J.), each entered December 1, 2015, which denied their respective motions for leave to reargue and to vacate prior judgments which granted petitioner's applications to vacate master arbitration awards.
Per Curiam.
Orders (Michael L. Katz, J.), each entered December 1, 2015, insofar as appealable, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs.
In prior unappealed judgments, Civil Court granted petitioner's CPLR 7511(b) applications to vacate the underlying no-fault arbitration awards on the ground that the arbitrator failed to disclose facts giving rise to an inference of bias. Respondents-appellants then moved to vacate those judgments on the ground that they were obtained through fraud, misrepresentation or other misconduct (see CPLR 5015[a][3]). Civil Court properly denied the motions, since respondents' contentions that petitioner had knowledge of the alleged conflicts of the arbitrator amount to nothing more than defense arguments "which could have been asserted prior to the entry of judgment" (Abacus Real Estate Fin. Co. v P.A.R. Constr. & Maintenance Corp., 128 AD2d 821 [1987]; see Fargnoli v Parisi, 176 AD2d 396 [1991]).
We have considered respondents' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: May 30, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. TC Acupuncture, P.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/country-wide-ins-co-v-tc-acupuncture-pc-nyappterm-2018.