Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. TC Acupuncture, P.C.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 30, 2018·No. 2018 NYSlipOp 50786(U)·Published

Opinion



Country-Wide Ins. Co., Petitioner-Respondent,

against

TC Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Jims Calixte, Respondent-Appellant.

Country-Wide Ins. Co., Petitioner-Respondent,

against

New Century Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o William Dew, Respondent-Appellant.

Country-Wide Ins. Co., Petitioner-Respondent,

against

New Century Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Debra Bond, Respondent-Appellant.

Country-Wide Ins. Co., Petitioner-Respondent,

against

New Century Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Ernig Mejia, Respondent-Appellant.

Country-Wide Ins. Co., Petitioner-Respondent,

against

TC Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Johnny Sejour, Respondent-Appellant.

Country-Wide Ins. Co., Petitioner-Respondent,

against

New Century Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o William Dew, Respondent-Appellant.


In consolidated appeals, respondents appeal from six orders of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Michael L. Katz, J.), each entered December 1, 2015, which denied their respective motions for leave to reargue and to vacate prior judgments which granted petitioner's applications to vacate master arbitration awards.

Per Curiam.

Orders (Michael L. Katz, J.), each entered December 1, 2015, insofar as appealable, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs.

In prior unappealed judgments, Civil Court granted petitioner's CPLR 7511(b) applications to vacate the underlying no-fault arbitration awards on the ground that the arbitrator failed to disclose facts giving rise to an inference of bias. Respondents-appellants then moved to vacate those judgments on the ground that they were obtained through fraud, misrepresentation or other misconduct (see CPLR 5015[a][3]). Civil Court properly denied the motions, since respondents' contentions that petitioner had knowledge of the alleged conflicts of the arbitrator amount to nothing more than defense arguments "which could have been asserted prior to the entry of judgment" (Abacus Real Estate Fin. Co. v P.A.R. Constr. & Maintenance Corp., 128 AD2d 821 [1987]; see Fargnoli v Parisi, 176 AD2d 396 [1991]).

We have considered respondents' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: May 30, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. TC Acupuncture, P.C., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. TC Acupuncture, P.C. (Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. TC Acupuncture, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abacus Real Estate Finance Co. v. P.A.R. Construction & Maintenance Corp.
128 A.D.2d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Fargnoli v. Parisi
176 A.D.2d 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)