Country Club at Coram, Inc. v. Lakeville Plumbing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Country Club at Coram, Inc. v. Lakeville Plumbing Co.

54 A.D.2d 573, 387 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13911

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 573 (Country Club at Coram, Inc. v. Lakeville Plumbing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Country Club at Coram, Inc. v. Lakeville Plumbing Co., 54 A.D.2d 573, 387 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In Action No. 1, a negligence action to recover property damages, plaintiffs, third-party defendant Allen & Grant and third-party defendant and third-party plaintiff Samuel Paul cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered February 25, 1976, which denied their separate motions for summary judgment. Order afiirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against defendant Lakeville Plumbing Co., Inc., and the other applications for relief, were each properly denied since there are clearly issues which [574]*574cannot be resolved on motions for summary judgment. The record indicates that there should be a presentation of issues in this case at a trial, flowing out of a full showing of fact by all of the parties hereto so that their respective duties may be properly determined. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Action No. 1, a negligence action to recover property damages, plaintiffs, third-party defendant Allen & Grant and third-party defendant and third-party plaintiff Samuel Paul cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered February 25, 1976, which denied their separate motions for summary judgment. Order afiirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against defendant Lakeville Plumbing Co., Inc., and the other applications for relief, were each properly denied since there are clearly issues which [574]*574cannot be resolved on motions for summary judgment. The record indicates that there should be a presentation of issues in this case at a trial, flowing out of a full showing of fact by all of the parties hereto so that their respective duties may be properly determined. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 573, 387 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/country-club-at-coram-inc-v-lakeville-plumbing-co-nyappdiv-1976.