Countouroudas v. Vance Security USA Corp.

412 F. App'x 632
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 15, 2011
DocketNo. 10-1351
StatusPublished

This text of 412 F. App'x 632 (Countouroudas v. Vance Security USA Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Countouroudas v. Vance Security USA Corp., 412 F. App'x 632 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Markella Countouroudas appeals the district court’s order granting Vance Security USA Corporation’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(c) motion for judgment on partial findings after a bench trial on Countouroudas’s pregnancy and gender discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp.2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and judgment. Countouroudas v. Vance Sec. USA Corp., No. 1:09-cv-00548-LMB-TCB (E.D.Va. Feb. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
412 F. App'x 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/countouroudas-v-vance-security-usa-corp-ca4-2011.