Counting Ballots in the Fifth Ward
This text of 6 Pa. D. & C. 388 (Counting Ballots in the Fifth Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
And now, Nov. 10, 1924, the within petition is refused because the question suggested cannot be raised on a count of the vote, but only on a contest: Bertolet’s Election, 13 Pa. C. C. Reps. 353. If the facts are as stated, the votes should have been counted. The act of assembly says that the voter shall make “a cross-mark in the appropriate square.” It does not say that this cross-mark shall be made with a pen or pencil. The voter may use either a pen or pencil, and he may usé any pen or pencil he sees fit. If the election judge excluded votes because the cross-mark was made with a pen or a pencil not furnished in the election booth, he did what he had no right to do.
Prom George Ross Bshleman, Lancaster, Pa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Pa. D. & C. 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/counting-ballots-in-the-fifth-ward-pactcompllancas-1924.