Counter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Counter v. State

365 S.W.2d 928, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1156

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 20, 1963

DocketNo. 35507

StatusPublished

This text of 365 S.W.2d 928 (Counter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Counter v. State, 365 S.W.2d 928, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1156 (Tex. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the making of a false representation in order to secure money under the terms of Article 107f, Vernon’s Ann. P.C.; the punishment, 30 days in jail.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is reformed to find appellant guilty of the offense set forth above' and, as so reformed, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the making of a false representation in order to secure money under the terms of Article 107f, Vernon’s Ann. P.C.; the punishment, 30 days in jail.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is reformed to find appellant guilty of the offense set forth above' and, as so reformed, is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 S.W.2d 928, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/counter-v-state-texcrimapp-1963.