COUNSEL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC v. DAVID MCQUADE LEIBOWITZ, P.C.

81 A.D.3d 1421, 916 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2011 NY Slip Op 01172
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 18, 2011
DocketCA 10-01202
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 81 A.D.3d 1421 (COUNSEL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC v. DAVID MCQUADE LEIBOWITZ, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
COUNSEL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC v. DAVID MCQUADE LEIBOWITZ, P.C., 81 A.D.3d 1421, 916 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2011 NY Slip Op 01172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered February 24, 2010. The order denied defendants’ motion to vacate the default order and judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion seeking to vacate a default order and judgment entered against them following their failure to oppose plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213. On a prior appeal, we affirmed the default order and judgment that granted plaintiffs motion and ordered defendants to *1422 pay a specified amount due on a promissory note executed by defendant David McQuade Leibowitz, P.C. and personally guaranteed by defendant David McQuade Leibowitz (Counsel Fin. Servs., LLC v David McQuade Leibowitz, P.C., 67 AD3d 1483 [2009]). Even assuming, arguendo, that the default order and judgment may be vacated pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) despite defendants’ prior appeal (see Pergamon Press v Tietze, 81 AD2d 831 [1981], lv dismissed 54 NY2d 605 [1981]; Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C5015:6), we conclude that Supreme Court properly refused to do so inasmuch as defendants failed to establish a reasonable excuse for their default and a meritorious defense to the action (see Brehm v Patton, 55 AD3d 1362 [2008]; cf. Wilcox v U-Haul Co., 256 AD2d 973 [1998]; see generally CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Fahey, Peradotto, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

in Re Counsel Financial Services, L.L.C.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013
FREMMING, MARGARET M. v. NIEDZIALOWSKI, PAUL E.
93 A.D.3d 1336 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 A.D.3d 1421, 916 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2011 NY Slip Op 01172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/counsel-financial-services-llc-v-david-mcquade-leibowitz-pc-nyappdiv-2011.