Council v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Opinion

- NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia|. United States Court of Appea|s for the Federa| Circuit 2009-3234 l DARRALYN C. COUNC|L, ‘ Petitioner, v. MER|T SYSTEMS PROTECT|ON BOARD, Resp0ndent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems F’rotecti0n Board in DA0752090124-|-1. ON MOT|ON Before RADER, Circuit Judge. 0 R D E R Darra|yn Counci| moves for “summary judgment." To the extent that Counci| is arguing the merits of his petition for review, such arguments should be included in his brief and not in a motion. Upon consideration thereof, |T IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied. FOR THE COURT sr gm 2 0 W_ /slJan_Horbaly Date Jan Horba|y Cierk ,_ n w cc: Darra|yn C. Counci| § . ~ 3 Dana DeLorenzo, Esq. ' i’_-"_’-;"~?_§o, 319 ` .»’? ii _‘ 41 »=:-‘1N a'¢-"1‘f>:'>a;i’,/ r""!,'. “r '" ~~~s..¢ §