Council v. . Floyd
185 S.E. 926, 210 N.C. 826, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 243
This text of 185 S.E. 926 (Council v. . Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Council v. . Floyd, 185 S.E. 926, 210 N.C. 826, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 243 (N.C. 1936).
Opinion
On the facts found and embodied in the judgment denying motion to set aside sale and vacate original judgments, the defendant has no just ground to complain.
He sought to use the original record as basis for an action of usury, and not until he was frustrated in that action did he seek his present remedy. No error has been made to appear.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harrell v. . Welstead
175 S.E. 283 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
185 S.E. 926, 210 N.C. 826, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/council-v-floyd-nc-1936.