Council v. Christiana Care Health Servies, Inc.

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedDecember 7, 2018
DocketN18C-09-124 AML
StatusPublished

This text of Council v. Christiana Care Health Servies, Inc. (Council v. Christiana Care Health Servies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Council v. Christiana Care Health Servies, Inc., (Del. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JONATHAN COUNCIL, Administrator of the ESTATE OF YVETTE WILMER and ZOI J.

COUNCIL, C.A. NO.: Nl 8C-O9-124 AML

Plaintiffs, JURY TRIAL OF 12 DEMANDED

V.

CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. a/k/a CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., DOCTORS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES, P.A., BRENT A. PASSARELLO, M.D. and MANDIE M. BAKER, M.D.

\/\/\/\_/\/\/\/V\./\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

Defendants.

Submitted: November 29, 2018 Decided: December 7, 2018

ORDER

Upon Review of the Affidavit of Merit - Accepted

On November 29, 2018, Defendants Christiana Care Health Services, Inc. (“CCHS”), Doctors for Emergency Services, P.A. (“DFES”), Brent A. Passarello, M.D., and Mandie M. Baker, M.D. (collectively “Defendants”) filed motions asking the Court to review Plaintiffs’ affidavit of merit, in camera, to determine Whether it

complies With 18 Del. C. §§ 6853(a)(1) and (c).l

1 18 Del. C. § 6853(d).

Specifically, Defendants asked the Court to determine Whether the affidavit: (l) is signed by an expert Witness; (2) is accompanied by a curriculum vitae; (3) states all of its opinions With reasonable medical certainty; (4) gives an opinion that there has been healthcare medical negligence against each defendant, including agents, servants, and employees of CCHS and DFES; (5) gives an opinion that each breach against each defendant Was a proximate cause of the injuries alleged in the complaint; and (6) indicates the expert is board certified in emergency medicine, is licensed to practice medicine as of the date of the affidavit, and the curriculum vitae establishes that the expert, for the three years preceding the alleged negligent act, has been engaged in the treatment of patients and/or in the teaching/academic side of medicine in the same or similar field of medicine as the Defendants, including each agent, servant, or employee of CCHS and DFES that the expert states is negligent

In Delaware, a healthcare negligence lawsuit must be filed With an affidavit of merit, signed by an expert, and accompanied by the expert’s current curriculum vitale.2 The expert must be licensed to practice medicine as of the affidavit’s date and engaged in the same or similar field as the defendant in the three years

immediately preceding the alleged negligence.3 The affidavit must state that

2 Ia'. § 6853(a)(l). _ 3 Ia'. § 6853(0). Although Defendants’ motions are phrased as though the curriculum vitae must establish that the expert has been engaged in the treatment of patients or teaching for the three

reasonable grounds exist to believe the defendant Was negligent in a Way that

proximately caused the plaintiff’s injury.4 The statute’s requirements are minimal.

Accordingly, an affidavit of merit tracking the statutory language complies With the

statute.5

After in camera revieW, the Court finds:

l.

2.

An expert signed the affidavit;

The affidavit Was accompanied by a current curriculum vitae;

The expert is Board certified in Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine;

In the three years preceding the negligent acts, the expert Was engaged in the treatment of patients and in the teaching/academic side of medicine in a similar field of medicine as the Defendants;

The affidavit states that there are reasonable grounds to believe the applicable standard of care Was breached by each defendant, including CCHS, DFES, Brent A. Passarello, M.D., and Mandie M. Baker, M.D.;

and

years preceding the alleged negligent acts, Section 6853 does not so require. Rather, under Section 6853, such experience may be attested to in the affidavit

4 ld.

5 See Dishmon v. Fucci, 32 A.3d 33 8, 342 (Del. 2011) (“In order to satisfy the prima facie burden, an Affidavit of Merit must only contain an expert’s sworn statement that medical negligence occurred, along With confirmation that he or she is qualified to proffer a medical opinion.”).

6. The expert states the identified breaches of the standard of care proximately caused Wilmer’s injury as alleged in the complaint.

Considering the above, the Court finds that the affidavit of merit complies

With 18 Del. C. §§ 6853(a)(l) and (c) as to Defendants Christiana Care Health

Services, Inc., Doctors for Emergency Services, P.A., Brent A. Passarello, M.D., and

ill ii Y>/

k"Nl\l)@ail\l

Mandie M. Baker, M.D.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Original to Prothonotary

cc: Richard Galperin, Esquire Joshua H. Meyeroff, Esquire Neilli Mullen Walsh, Esquire

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 6853
Delaware § 6853(a)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Council v. Christiana Care Health Servies, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/council-v-christiana-care-health-servies-inc-delsuperct-2018.