Council of Hamtramck v. Hamtramck City Clerk

Michigan Supreme Court

Council of Hamtramck v. Hamtramck City Clerk

280 N.W. 801, 285 Mich. 390

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 16, 1938

DocketCalendar 40,159

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 N.W. 801 (Council of Hamtramck v. Hamtramck City Clerk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Council of Hamtramck v. Hamtramck City Clerk, 280 N.W. 801, 285 Mich. 390 (Mich. 1938).

Pincite

Opinions

Wiest, C. J.

In City of Muskegon Heights v. Danigelis, 253 Mich. 260 (73 A. L. R. 696), we defined “calamity bonds,” and I stand firmly by that decision.

“Calamity bonds” remain such, regardless of attempted mutation, may be in single or successive issues, but cannot, in aggregate amount, exceed the limit fixed by law.

I, therefore, concur in denying the writ.

Butzel, Sharpe, Chandler, and North, JJ., concurred with Wiest, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI