Council of Hamtramck v. Hamtramck City Clerk

Michigan Supreme Court

Council of Hamtramck v. Hamtramck City Clerk

280 N.W. 801, 285 Mich. 390

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 16, 1938·No. Calendar 40,159·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Wiest, C. J.

In City of Muskegon Heights v. Danigelis, 253 Mich. 260 (73 A. L. R. 696), we defined “calamity bonds,” and I stand firmly by that decision.

“Calamity bonds” remain such, regardless of attempted mutation, may be in single or successive issues, but cannot, in aggregate amount, exceed the limit fixed by law.

I, therefore, concur in denying the writ.

Butzel, Sharpe, Chandler, and North, JJ., concurred with Wiest, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiest, C. J.

In City of Muskegon Heights v. Danigelis, 253 Mich. 260 (73 A. L. R. 696), we defined “calamity bonds,” and I stand firmly by that decision.

“Calamity bonds” remain such, regardless of attempted mutation, may be in single or successive issues, but cannot, in aggregate amount, exceed the limit fixed by law.

I, therefore, concur in denying the writ.

Butzel, Sharpe, Chandler, and North, JJ., concurred with Wiest, J.

Council of Hamtramck v. Hamtramck City Clerk, 280 N.W. 801, 285 Mich. 390 (Mich. 1938).

Pincite

280 N.W. 801 (Council of Hamtramck v. Hamtramck City Clerk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related