Council of Defiance v. State ex rel. Chapman

68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 734
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 23, 1903
DocketNo. 8166
StatusPublished

This text of 68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 734 (Council of Defiance v. State ex rel. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Council of Defiance v. State ex rel. Chapman, 68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 734 (Ohio 1903).

Opinion

Judgment of the circuit court and of common pleas reversed and petition of plaintiff below dismissed for the reason that mandamus is not the proper remedy, the plaintiff having an adequate remedy at law.

Burket, C. J., Davis, Shauck, Price and Crew, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/council-of-defiance-v-state-ex-rel-chapman-ohio-1903.