Council of Defiance v. State ex rel. Chapman

68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 734
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 23, 1903·No. No. 8166·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the circuit court and of common pleas reversed and petition of plaintiff below dismissed for the reason that mandamus is not the proper remedy, the plaintiff having an adequate remedy at law.

Burket, C. J., Davis, Shauck, Price and Crew, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Council of Defiance v. State ex rel. Chapman, 68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 734 (Ohio 1903).

68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 734 (Council of Defiance v. State ex rel. Chapman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.