Council of Co-Owners of Forest Beach Villas Horizontal Property Regime v. Smith

428 S.E.2d 745, 311 S.C. 297, 1993 S.C. App. LEXIS 43
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 22, 1993
Docket1977
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 428 S.E.2d 745 (Council of Co-Owners of Forest Beach Villas Horizontal Property Regime v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Council of Co-Owners of Forest Beach Villas Horizontal Property Regime v. Smith, 428 S.E.2d 745, 311 S.C. 297, 1993 S.C. App. LEXIS 43 (S.C. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinions

Goolsby, Judge:

The issue presented in this appeal by the Council of Co-Owners of Forest Beach Villas Horizontal Property Regime in this foreclosure action brought by it against M. Daniel Smith and others is whether a purchaser of a condominium apartment at a foreclosure sale in an action brought to foreclose a lien for unpaid assessments is jointly and severally liable for assessments arising prior to the purchaser’s taking title at the foreclosure sale.

The Council of Co-Owners brought this action to foreclose its lien for unpaid assessments against Smith, the owner of an apartment at Forest Beach Villas. The respondent Arthur Leaman and the other respondent creditors who held a judgment lien that had been duly recorded prior to the Council of Co-Owners’ lien counterclaimed, asserting that their lien constituted a first lien on the subject property.

The circuit court granted Leaman’s motions for default judgment and summary judgment and issued an order of foreclosure and sale. Its order indicated that the purchaser at the foreclosure sale would not be liable for past-due sums assessed by the Council of Co-Owners. The Council of Co-Owners contends this was error, pointing to S.C. Code Ann. §§ 27-[299]*299Sl^lOCb)1 and 27-31-2202 (1991). It asserts the only purchasers excluded from joint and several liability are purchasers at foreclosure sales brought by a mortgagee of any mortgage of record.

Although § 27-31-210(b) refers only to a purchaser at a foreclosure sale brought by a mortgagee of any mortgage of record, our inquiry does not stop there. Section 27-31-210(a)3 must also be considered. See Columbia Gaslight Co. v. Mobley, 139 S.C. 107, 137 S.E. 211 (1927) (separate statutes relating to the same subject matter must be construed together and effect given to each). The section expressly allows a lien for unpaid assessments “[to] be foreclosed by suit... in like manner as a mortgage of real property.” That is precisely what occurred here. The Council of Co-Owners foreclosed its lien by suit as though its lien were “a mortgage of real property.” Because the lien here was foreclosed by suit “in like manner as a mortgage of real property,” the purchaser of the apartment at the sale ordered by the circuit court enjoys the same protection that would have been afforded a purchaser thereof had the foreclosure sale been one as described in § 27-[300]*30031-210(b), that is, a foreclosure sale of a mortgagee of any mortgage of record. See 4 S.C. Juris. Condominiums § 27, at 223 (1991) (“[I]f an apartment is purchased at foreclosure [brought by the council of co-owners] by any bona fide lien holder, such purchaser shall not be liable for the payment of any assessments accruing after the recording of the lien and prior to the date of the foreclosure sale.”). We therefore hold a purchaser of a condominium apartment at a foreclosure sale in an action brought to foreclose a lien for unpaid assessments is not jointly and severally liable for assessments arising prior to the purchaser’s taking title at the foreclosure sale.

Affirmed.

Littlejohn, Acting J., concurs. Gardner, J., dissents in a separate opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Council of Co-Owners of Forest Beach Villas Horizontal Property Regime v. Smith
442 S.E.2d 173 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
428 S.E.2d 745, 311 S.C. 297, 1993 S.C. App. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/council-of-co-owners-of-forest-beach-villas-horizontal-property-regime-v-scctapp-1993.