Coulter v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Coulter v. United States

90 F. App'x 60

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 22, 2004·No. No. 03-1745·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Evelyn Coulter appeals the district court’s order dismissing her Federal Tort Claims Act action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no re[61]*61versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coulter v. United States, No. CA-02-1645 (E.D.Va. Apr. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Evelyn Coulter appeals the district court’s order dismissing her Federal Tort Claims Act action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no re[61]*61versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coulter v. United States, No. CA-02-1645 (E.D.Va. Apr. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Coulter v. United States, 90 F. App'x 60 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

90 F. App'x 60 (Coulter v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related