Coulter v. State

113 S.E. 47, 29 Ga. App. 46, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 39
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coulter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Ga. App. 243
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1922·No. 13700·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There is ample evidence to support the verdict found against Chester Coulter and Hugh McGhee. The evidence against T. II. Coulter is not so strong, but this court cannot say, as a matter of law, that there is no evidence to support the verdict against him. The verdict has the approval of the judge who tried the case. “ Whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the [47]*47judgment of the trial court." Owens v. State, 27 Ga. App. 322 (108 S. E. 208).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coulter v. State, 113 S.E. 47, 29 Ga. App. 46, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 39 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

113 S.E. 47 (Coulter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owens v. State
108 S.E. 208 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)