Coulter v. State
This text of 4 So. 3d 1255 (Coulter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Adrian Coulter (“defendant”) appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of an occupied dwelling and theft. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the public defender moved to withdraw and filed a memorandum brief. Defendant filed a statement raising only issues pertaining to ineffective assistance of trial counsel. [1256]*1256Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel should be raised in a postconviction motion in the trial court. Sireci v. State, 469 So.2d 119, 120 (Fla.1985). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment below, without prejudice to defendant filing a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion in the trial court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 So. 3d 1255, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1940, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coulter-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.