Coulter v. State
This text of 515 So. 2d 432 (Coulter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction but direct the trial court to strike the provision in the sentencing order taxing costs against appellant without prejudice to the state to apply to the trial court for an order taxing costs upon a hearing and showing that appellant has the ability to pay costs. Our affirmance of the conviction is predicated upon our view that the record does not support appellant’s contention that a hear[433]*433say identification of appellant was admitted into evidence at trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 So. 2d 432, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2647, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coulter-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.