Coulter, J. v. Tony Bagnato
This text of Coulter, J. v. Tony Bagnato (Coulter, J. v. Tony Bagnato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
JEAN COULTER, : No. 59 WM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PHILIP A. IGNELZI, TIMOTHY P. O'REILLY, : RONALD W. FOLINO, TONY BAGNATO, : JAMIE L. LENZI, CIPRIANI & WERNER : AND DAVID N. WECHT, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2020, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The
Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of the jurists from the caption.
Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Coulter, J. v. Tony Bagnato, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coulter-j-v-tony-bagnato-pa-2020.