Coulson v. Herr

124 So. 736, 98 Fla. 622
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND STRUM AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

*Page 623

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
CHARLES L. COULSON, Appellant, v. H. L. HERR, Appellee.
Opinion filed November 26, 1929.
Where a "finding" as distinguished from the essentials of the "order" or "decree" may, without affecting the remainder of the order or decree, be eliminated as surplusage in that there is no evidence in the record sustaining such "finding," the appellate court will remand the cause with instructions to eliminate such finding from the order or decree.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; T. Frank Hobson, Judge.

Remanded with instructions.

Motion for rehearing denied.

W. F. Way, for Appellant;

Wm. G. King, Merle E. Rudy and Guyte P. McCord, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coulson v. Herr, 124 So. 736, 98 Fla. 622 (Fla. 1929).

124 So. 736 (Coulson v. Herr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boulder Venture South, LLC v. Sabow
204 So. 3d 114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)