Coulon v. Champlin
This text of 15 La. 544 (Coulon v. Champlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The defendant, being sued as endorser of a promissory note, pleaded the general issue. The only point made in [545]*545the cause turns on the insufficiency of the notice given to him. The certificate of the notary states, “that notice of protest was left at defendant’s domicil with a colored woman, he not being in, and there being no white person in or about the premises ” It has been held by this court, that notice of non-payment given to endorsers by leaving it at their dwelling houses, is sufficient. 6 Louisiana Reports, 729, Franklin vs. Verbois et al. Damages have been prayed for by appellee, and should, we think, be allowed.
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed, with costs, and ten per cent, damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 La. 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coulon-v-champlin-la-1840.