Coulibaly v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

584 F. App'x 178
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2014·No. No. 14-1594·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tiemoko Coulibaly and Fatou Gaye-Coulibaly appeal from the district court’s orders denying their motions filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coulibaly v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 8:10-cv-03517-DKC, 2014 WL 992778 (D.Md. Mar. 13 & June 16, 2014). We deny the cross-motions to strike and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coulibaly v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 584 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2014).

584 F. App'x 178 (Coulibaly v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.