Couillard v. Hawkins

330 S.E.2d 293, 285 S.C. 463, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 420
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 14, 1985
Docket22319
StatusPublished

This text of 330 S.E.2d 293 (Couillard v. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Couillard v. Hawkins, 330 S.E.2d 293, 285 S.C. 463, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 420 (S.C. 1985).

Opinion

Chandler, Justice:

Respondent Michael B. Couillard brought suit against Appellant Terry J. Hawkins for injuries received when Hawkins’ dog ran in front of the mortorcycle being driven by Couillard.

Hawkins demurred to Couillard’s first cause of action which alleged strict liability in tort. From an order of the trial judge overruling the demurrer, Hawkins appeals.

We reverse.

This Court recently extended the liability of dog owners for personal injury and property loss caused by their dogs.1 We did not, however, impose a standard of strict liability in tort.

Accordingly, the demurrer should have been granted.

Plaintiff, in view of the modification of existing law, shall be permitted to file an amended pleading.

Reversed.

Littlejohn, C. J., and Ness, Gregory and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hossenlopp Ex Rel. Hossenlopp v. Cannon
329 S.E.2d 438 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
330 S.E.2d 293, 285 S.C. 463, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/couillard-v-hawkins-sc-1985.