Coughlin v. Otis Elevator Co.
This text of 244 A.D. 815 (Coughlin v. Otis Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action brought against a receiver of rents and profits in a foreclosure action for negligence in failing to keep and maintain a passenger elevator in a safe and repaired condition, a motion to dismiss the complaint as to one of the defendants, upon the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, was denied. Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on authority of Woman’s Hospital v. Loubern Realty Corp. (266 N. Y. 123; followed in New York Life Insurance Co. v. Haylitt Realty Corp., Id. 454.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, J J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coughlin-v-otis-elevator-co-nyappdiv-1935.