Coughlin v. Otis Elevator Co.

244 A.D. 815
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action brought against a receiver of rents and profits in a foreclosure action for negligence in failing to keep and maintain a passenger elevator in a safe and repaired condition, a motion to dismiss the complaint as to one of the defendants, upon the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, was denied. Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on authority of Woman’s Hospital v. Loubern Realty Corp. (266 N. Y. 123; followed in New York Life Insurance Co. v. Haylitt Realty Corp., Id. 454.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, J J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coughlin v. Otis Elevator Co., 244 A.D. 815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

244 A.D. 815 (Coughlin v. Otis Elevator Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morgan v. Steingut
248 A.D. 762 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Cusimano v. Strong
247 A.D. 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)