Coughlin, A. v. Massaquoi, U.
144 A.3d 925, 636 Pa. 464, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1877, 2016 WL 4467279
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 24, 2016
Docket166 EAL 2016 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 144 A.3d 925 (Coughlin, A. v. Massaquoi, U.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coughlin, A. v. Massaquoi, U., 144 A.3d 925, 636 Pa. 464, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1877, 2016 WL 4467279 (Pa. 2016).
Opinion
*465 ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
In a civil trial brought on behalf of a pedestrian who was killed by a motorist, is it reversible error where the defendant motorist admits evidence of the pedestrian’s uncorroborated post-mortem blood alcohol content (BAC) by way of a toxicology expert who merely explains the uncorroborated BAC in terms of how an equivalent BAC would render an “average” person unfit to cross the street?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Coughlin, A., Aplt. v. Massaquoi, U.
170 A.3d 399 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
144 A.3d 925, 636 Pa. 464, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1877, 2016 WL 4467279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coughlin-a-v-massaquoi-u-pa-2016.