Couey v. Bracewell

111 Ga. App. 760
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 4, 1965·No. 41196·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

This is a companion case to Bracewell v. Bracewell, ante. The evidence authorized the jury to find that the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the concurring acts of negligence by the joint defendants. The only ground urged in this case is that the host driver’s negligence was the sole proximate cause of the injuries sued for. The court did not err in overruling the motion of this defendant, but a new trial must be granted him upon proper application, inasmuch as the verdict was joint and a new trial is granted, to the codefendant, the plaintiff in error in the case of Bracewell v. Bracewell, ante. Smith v. Barnett, 109 Ga. App. 142 (135 SE2d 435).

The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan and Russell, JJ., concur. Jones & Douglas, Erie L. Jones, for plaintiff in error. B. B. Hayes, H. Dale Thompson, Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hancock, James B. Hiers, Jr., Richard H. Monk, Jr., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Couey v. Bracewell, 111 Ga. App. 760 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965).

111 Ga. App. 760 (Couey v. Bracewell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knox v. Landers
285 S.E.2d 767 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Carlson v. Holt
262 S.E.2d 508 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Durrett v. Farrar
203 S.E.2d 265 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Smith v. Nelson
182 S.E.2d 332 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Mullis v. Chaika
162 S.E.2d 448 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)