Couch v. Wood
This text of 119 S.E. 691 (Couch v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The written instrument offered for probate was a sufficient compliance with the law to constitute a will, and was mutual in character. Compare Bright v. Cox, 147 Ga. 474 (94 S. E. 572).
2.. The testimony introduced by the propounders was without contradiction, and fully established the facts that the will was executed [627]*627by tbe testator and that the testator was of sound and disposing mind and memory. Therefore the court did not err in directing a verdict for the pro-pounders. Walters v. Walters, 151 Ga. 527 (107 S. E. 492). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 S.E. 691, 156 Ga. 626, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/couch-v-wood-ga-1923.