Couch v. Wood

119 S.E. 691, 156 Ga. 626, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 288
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 12, 1923
DocketNo. 3588
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 119 S.E. 691 (Couch v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Couch v. Wood, 119 S.E. 691, 156 Ga. 626, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 288 (Ga. 1923).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. The written instrument offered for probate was a sufficient compliance with the law to constitute a will, and was mutual in character. Compare Bright v. Cox, 147 Ga. 474 (94 S. E. 572).

2.. The testimony introduced by the propounders was without contradiction, and fully established the facts that the will was executed [627]*627by tbe testator and that the testator was of sound and disposing mind and memory. Therefore the court did not err in directing a verdict for the pro-pounders. Walters v. Walters, 151 Ga. 527 (107 S. E. 492). Judgment affirmed.

No. 3588. October 12, 1923. All the Justices concur. W. B. Sloan and Paul L. Lindsay, for plaintiffs in error. Charters, Wheeler & Lilly, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Leaptrot
171 S.E.2d 555 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 S.E. 691, 156 Ga. 626, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/couch-v-wood-ga-1923.