Couch v. Hughes
9 Mo. 768
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The facts of this case are substantially the same with those of the case of Lewis vs. Lewis. It was a bill in chancery praying for a decree of title from the person who had entered a quarter section of land, upon which the complainant had a right of pre-emption, but which pre-emption right was not allowed by the register and receiver. The bill was demurred to, and the demurrer was sustained.
The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Couch v. Hughes, 9 Mo. 768 (Mo. 1846).
9 Mo. 768 (Couch v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Cataldo
268 S.W.2d 836 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1954)
State v. Fowler
89 P. 757 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1907)
Hess v. Sparks
44 Kan. 465 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1890)
Linck v. Kelley
25 Ind. 278 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1865)