Couch v. City Of Detroit
This text of 21 F.3d 427 (Couch v. City Of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
21 F.3d 427
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Harold COUCH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The CITY OF DETROIT, et al.; Defendants.
Charles Wing, Police Officer; Kevin Brown, Police Officer;
Michael Marsalis, Police Officer; Duane Blackmon,
Police Officer; Brenda Makulski, Police
Officer, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 933-1192.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 29, 1994.
Before: KENNEDY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges; and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Having carefully considered the record herein, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, we AFFIRM the district court for the reasons set out in United States District Judge Patrick J. Duggan's opinion and the order entered thereon on January 22, 1993.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 F.3d 427, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/couch-v-city-of-detroit-ca6-1994.