Cottrill v. Frisicano
259 A.D. 1067, 22 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7998
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 28, 1940
StatusPublished
This text of 259 A.D. 1067 (Cottrill v. Frisicano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cottrill v. Frisicano, 259 A.D. 1067, 22 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7998 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judg[1068]*1068ment is for plaintiff in an action to recover brokerage commissions. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 1067, 22 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cottrill-v-frisicano-nyappdiv-1940.