Cottrell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cottrell v. State

290 S.W. 175

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 19, 1927·No. No. 10678·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction was for manufacturing malt liquor containing in excess of 1 per cent, of alcohol by volume, and punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement* of facts or bills' of exception. The indictment charges an offense. The regularity of all proceedings must be presumed in the absence of complaint. Nothing is presented to this court for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction was for manufacturing malt liquor containing in excess of 1 per cent, of alcohol by volume, and punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement* of facts or bills' of exception. The indictment charges an offense. The regularity of all proceedings must be presumed in the absence of complaint. Nothing is presented to this court for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cottrell v. State, 290 S.W. 175 (Tex. 1927).

Pincite

290 S.W. 175 (Cottrell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.