Cottrell v. Oliver
This text of 22 Ark. 546 (Cottrell v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
In this case the issues were submitted to the court, sitting as a jury. Several witnesses were examined, and on the evidence adduced, the court found for Oliver, who was the plaintiff below. The defendant excepted to the finding, took a bill of exceptions, setting out the evidence, and brought error, without having moved for a new trial, or having asked the court to declare any one or more propositions to be the law of the case. There is, therefore, according to the rule in State Bank vs. Conway, 13 Ark. 344, no question of law legitimately presented for the decision of this court, and the judgment must be affirmed-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Ark. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cottrell-v-oliver-ark-1861.