Cottrell v. Den ex dem. Thompson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Cottrell v. Den ex dem. Thompson

15 N.J.L. 344

DecidedMay 15, 1836

StatusPublished

This text of 15 N.J.L. 344 (Cottrell v. Den ex dem. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cottrell v. Den ex dem. Thompson, 15 N.J.L. 344 (N.J. 1836).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

We can make no rule on the executors. The consent of parties can give us no authority to render an extra judicial judgment in the premises. If the executors of the lessor of the plaintiff, are liable for the costs, it must be on the undertaking of their testator, to pay costs according to the terms of the consent rule entered into by him ; and whether they are so liable or not, we must leave to be settled in an action against them, by the defendant in ejectment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:.

We can make no rule on the executors. The consent of parties can give us no authority to render an extra judicial judgment in the premises. If the executors of the lessor of the plaintiff, are liable for the costs, it must be on the undertaking of their testator, to pay costs according to the terms of the consent rule entered into by him ; and whether they are so liable or not, we must leave to be settled in an action against them, by the defendant in ejectment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 N.J.L. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cottrell-v-den-ex-dem-thompson-nj-1836.