Cottrell v. Cates

67 Ill. App. 401, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 112
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedNovember 21, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 67 Ill. App. 401 (Cottrell v. Cates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cottrell v. Cates, 67 Ill. App. 401, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 112 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Boggs

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

The question involved in the case is whether appellants have a perpetual easement in the lands of appellee.

A perpetual easement is a freehold interest in land. Tinker v. Forbes, 138 Ill. 234; Goudy v. Lake View, 31 Ill. App. 653.

Jurisdiction to entertain the appeal is in the Supreme Court, not the Appellate Court. The appeal must be, and is, dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anglo-American Packing & Provision Co. v. Baier
31 Ill. App. 653 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Ill. App. 401, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cottrell-v-cates-illappct-1896.