Cottrell v. Cates

67 Ill. App. 401, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 112

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided November 21, 1896·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Boggs

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

The question involved in the case is whether appellants have a perpetual easement in the lands of appellee.

A perpetual easement is a freehold interest in land. Tinker v. Forbes, 138 Ill. 234; Goudy v. Lake View, 31 Ill. App. 653.

Jurisdiction to entertain the appeal is in the Supreme Court, not the Appellate Court. The appeal must be, and is, dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Boggs

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

The question involved in the case is whether appellants have a perpetual easement in the lands of appellee.

A perpetual easement is a freehold interest in land. Tinker v. Forbes, 138 Ill. 234; Goudy v. Lake View, 31 Ill. App. 653.

Jurisdiction to entertain the appeal is in the Supreme Court, not the Appellate Court. The appeal must be, and is, dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Cottrell v. Cates, 67 Ill. App. 401, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 112 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

67 Ill. App. 401 (Cottrell v. Cates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.