Cottonwood v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cottonwood v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2024 MT 313
Montana Supreme Court·Decided August 26, 2024·No. DA 24-0324·Unpublished

Opinion

08/26/2024

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 24-0324 Supreme Court Cause No. DA-24-0324

COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER; LIZ AMETSBOSCHLER; DANNY CHORIKI; JEREMY DRAKE; AVIV GUSCIO; KATIE HARRISON; YOUPA STEIN; MARY ORDER STRANAHAN; JAN SWANSON; TOMAS WALDORF, Plaintiffs/Appellees

vs. STATE OF MONTANA,

Defendant/Appellant

Plaintiffs/Appellees Cottonwood Environmental Law Center, Liz

Ametsboschler, Danny Choriki, Jeremy Drake, Aviv Guscio, Katie Harrison,

Youpa Stein, Mary Stranahan, Jan Swanson, and Tomas Waldorf (collectively

“Appellees”) moved for a 30-day extension of time to file their response brief.

Defendant/Appellant State of Montana does not oppose the motion.

Appellees’ motion is granted.

Appellees shall file their response brief on or before October 7, 2024.

Dated this ____ day of ______________, 2024.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court August 26 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cottonwood v. State, (Mo. 2024).

Cottonwood v. State (Cottonwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.