Cottonwood Environmental v. Knudsen

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cottonwood Environmental v. Knudsen. Read the opinion of the Court — 2022 MT 49
Montana Supreme Court·Decided February 23, 2022·No. OP 22-0076·Unpublished

Opinion

02/23/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0076

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA

Case No. OP 22–0076

COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER; MONTANA RIVERS; GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION; JOHN MEYER, Petitioners,

v.

AUSTIN KNUDSEN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MONTANA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY

Upon consideration of the motion filed by Petitioners Cottonwood Environmental Law

Center, Montana Rivers, Gallatin Wildlife Association, and John Meyer, for leave to file a reply brief,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a one paragraph reply and one supporting

exhibit is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the reply brief shall be prepared, filed, and served by

February 23, 2022.

DATED this ___ day of February, 2022.

cc: John Meyer Austin Knudsen Austin James Neil Westesen Dale Schowengerdt

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court February 23 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cottonwood Environmental v. Knudsen, (Mo. 2022).

Cottonwood Environmental v. Knudsen (Cottonwood Environmental v. Knudsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.