Cottonwood Environmental v. Knudsen

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cottonwood Environmental v. Knudsen. Read the opinion of the Court — 2022 MT 49
Montana Supreme Court·Decided February 23, 2022·No. OP 22-0076·Unpublished

Opinion

02/23/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0076

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA Case No. OP 22–0076 _________________________________

COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER; MONTANA RIVERS; GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION; JOHN MEYER, Petitioners, v. AUSTIN KNUDSEN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MONTANA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. ___________________________

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY __________________

Upon consideration of the motion filed by Petitioners Cottonwood Environmental Law

Center, Montana Rivers, Gallatin Wildlife Association, and John Meyer, for leave to file a reply brief,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a one paragraph reply and one supporting

exhibit is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the reply brief shall be prepared, filed, and served by

February 23, 2022.

DATED this ___ day of February, 2022.

________________________

_________________________

cc: John Meyer Austin Knudsen Austin James Neil Westesen Dale Schowengerdt

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court February 23 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cottonwood Environmental v. Knudsen, (Mo. 2022).

Cottonwood Environmental v. Knudsen (Cottonwood Environmental v. Knudsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.